Kokeile poliittinen tietokilpailu
Muokkaa profiiliaVahvista tili

@2

Syöttö Vertailla
+
Laajentaa

101 Keskustelut

 @ISIDEWITH linkitetty…7 tuntia7H

Trump Signals Progress in US-China Trade Talks Amid Tariff Turmoil

Trumpin tullipäivitykset: Trump sanoo, että Yhdysvallat ja Kiina neuvottelevat sopimuksesta

 @ISIDEWITH linkitetty…7 tuntia7H

Trump Signals Progress in US-China Trade Talks Amid Tariff Turmoil

Trumpin tullit live-päivitykset: Trump kehuu kauppaneuvottelujen edistymistä, sanoo "tekevänsä sopimuksen" Kiinan kanssa

 @ISIDEWITH lähetetty…7 tuntia7H

Trump Signals Progress in US-China Trade Talks Amid Tariff Turmoil

 @ISIDEWITH lähetetty…9tuntia9H

Trump Ousts Musk-Backed IRS Chief Amid Treasury Power Struggle

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the EU redirect tariff revenue to support industries and workers impacted by U.S. trade restrictions?

No, it’s better to cut taxes to boost competitiveness

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the EU redirect tariff revenue to support industries and workers impacted by U.S. trade restrictions?

Yes, but distribute it evenly across all member states

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the EU redirect tariff revenue to support industries and workers impacted by U.S. trade restrictions?

No, revenue should bolster the EU budget for broader resilience

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the EU redirect tariff revenue to support industries and workers impacted by U.S. trade restrictions?

Yes, and target aid to sectors like automotive and agriculture

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the EU exempt critical sectors, like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

Yes, but only if the U.S. reciprocates with exemptions

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the EU exempt critical sectors, like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

No, all U.S. goods should face tariffs to ensure equity

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the EU exempt critical sectors, like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

Yes, and broaden exemptions to protect supply chains

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the EU exempt critical sectors, like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

No, exemptions dilute the EU’s trade leverage

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the European Union maintain its 20% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs on EU exports?

Yes, and expand them to pressure the U.S. into negotiations

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the European Union maintain its 20% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs on EU exports?

No, the EU should pursue tariff-free trade with the U.S. instead

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the European Union maintain its 20% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs on EU exports?

Yes, but adjust them yearly based on trade talks progress

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the European Union maintain its 20% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs on EU exports?

No, this will escalate costs for European consumers

 @ISIDEWITH kysyi…10 tuntia10H

Should the EU redirect tariff revenue to support industries and workers impacted by U.S. trade restrictions?

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the EU redirect tariff revenue to support industries and workers impacted by U.S. trade restrictions?

Kyllä

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the EU redirect tariff revenue to support industries and workers impacted by U.S. trade restrictions?

Ei

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the EU exempt critical sectors, like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

Ei

 @ISIDEWITH kysyi…10 tuntia10H

Should the EU exempt critical sectors, like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the EU exempt critical sectors, like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

Kyllä

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the European Union maintain its 20% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs on EU exports?

Ei

 @ISIDEWITH kysyi…10 tuntia10H

Should the European Union maintain its 20% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs on EU exports?

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the European Union maintain its 20% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs on EU exports?

Kyllä

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the government use tariff revenue to directly support Canadian workers and businesses affected by U.S. trade actions?

No, the revenue should reduce national debt instead

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the government use tariff revenue to directly support Canadian workers and businesses affected by U.S. trade actions?

Yes, and focus funds on industries hit hardest by tariffs

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the government use tariff revenue to directly support Canadian workers and businesses affected by U.S. trade actions?

No, it’s better to lower taxes than redirect tariff funds

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the government use tariff revenue to directly support Canadian workers and businesses affected by U.S. trade actions?

Yes, but distribute it broadly to all taxpayers

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should Canada exempt critical industries, like aerospace and energy, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

Yes, and prioritize exemptions for all essential supply chains

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should Canada exempt critical industries, like aerospace and energy, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

Yes, but only if the U.S. offers reciprocal exemptions

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should Canada exempt critical industries, like aerospace and energy, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

No, exemptions weaken Canada’s leverage in trade talks

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should Canada exempt critical industries, like aerospace and energy, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

No, all U.S. goods should face tariffs to ensure fairness

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the Canadian government maintain its 25% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs?

Yes, and expand them to cover more U.S. imports

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the Canadian government maintain its 25% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs?

No, this harms Canadian consumers more than it helps

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the Canadian government maintain its 25% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs?

Yes, but adjust them annually based on trade negotiations

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the Canadian government maintain its 25% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs?

No, tariffs should be removed to restore free trade

 @ISIDEWITH kysyi…10 tuntia10H

Should the government use tariff revenue to directly support Canadian workers and businesses affected by U.S. trade actions?

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the government use tariff revenue to directly support Canadian workers and businesses affected by U.S. trade actions?

Kyllä

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the government use tariff revenue to directly support Canadian workers and businesses affected by U.S. trade actions?

Ei

 @ISIDEWITH kysyi…10 tuntia10H

Should Canada exempt critical industries, like aerospace and energy, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should Canada exempt critical industries, like aerospace and energy, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

Ei

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should Canada exempt critical industries, like aerospace and energy, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

Kyllä

 @ISIDEWITH kysyi…10 tuntia10H

Should the Canadian government maintain its 25% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs?

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the Canadian government maintain its 25% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs?

Kyllä

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the Canadian government maintain its 25% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs?

Ei

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the government impose a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports from every country?

No, tariffs should only target specific countries with unfair practices

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the government impose a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports from every country?

No, this will raise consumer prices and harm global trade

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the government impose a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports from every country?

Yes, and increase it annually to protect domestic industries

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the government impose a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports from every country?

Yes, and use it to negotiate better trade deals globally

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the government apply higher reciprocal tariffs, like 34% on China, to countries with large trade deficits?

No, trade deficits are not a threat that justifies such measures

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the government apply higher reciprocal tariffs, like 34% on China, to countries with large trade deficits?

No, this will escalate tensions and disrupt global supply chains

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the government apply higher reciprocal tariffs, like 34% on China, to countries with large trade deficits?

Yes, and adjust them yearly based on trade balance changes

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the government apply higher reciprocal tariffs, like 34% on China, to countries with large trade deficits?

Yes, and expand them to all nations with unfair trade policies

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the government exempt essential goods, like pharmaceuticals, from the 2025 tariff increases?

No, all imports should face tariffs to ensure fair competition

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the government exempt essential goods, like pharmaceuticals, from the 2025 tariff increases?

No, exemptions weaken the goal of reshoring manufacturing

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…10 tuntia10H

Should the government exempt essential goods, like pharmaceuticals, from the 2025 tariff increases?

Yes, but review exemptions annually to encourage domestic production

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…11tuntia11H

Should the government exempt essential goods, like pharmaceuticals, from the 2025 tariff increases?

Yes, and extend exemptions to all critical supply chain items

 @ISIDEWITH kysyi…11tuntia11H

Should the government exempt essential goods, like pharmaceuticals, from the 2025 tariff increases?

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…11tuntia11H

Should the government exempt essential goods, like pharmaceuticals, from the 2025 tariff increases?

Kyllä

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…11tuntia11H

Should the government exempt essential goods, like pharmaceuticals, from the 2025 tariff increases?

Ei

 @ISIDEWITH kysyi…11tuntia11H

Should the government apply higher reciprocal tariffs, like 34% on China, to countries with large trade deficits?

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…11tuntia11H

Should the government apply higher reciprocal tariffs, like 34% on China, to countries with large trade deficits?

Ei

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…11tuntia11H

Should the government apply higher reciprocal tariffs, like 34% on China, to countries with large trade deficits?

Kyllä

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…11tuntia11H

Should the government impose a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports from every country?

Ei

 @ISIDEWITHKeskustele tästä vastauksesta...…11tuntia11H

Should the government impose a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports from every country?

Kyllä

 @ISIDEWITH kysyi…11tuntia11H

Should the government impose a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports from every country?

 @ISIDEWITH lähetetty…13 tuntia13H

10,000 Pages of RFK Assassination Files Released, Fueling New Questions and Theories

 @ISIDEWITH lähetetty…14 tuntia14H

U.S. Intensifies Airstrikes on Yemen's Houthis Amid Escalating Red Sea Conflict

 @ISIDEWITH linkitetty…17tuntia17H

Myanmar Junta Releases Nearly 4,900 Prisoners in Surprise New Year Amnesty

Myanmar vapauttaa noin 4 900 vankia, mukaan lukien joitain poliittisia vankeja

 @ISIDEWITH linkitetty…17tuntia17H

Myanmar Junta Releases Nearly 4,900 Prisoners in Surprise New Year Amnesty

Myanmar vapauttaa lähes 4 900 vankia, mukaan lukien joitain poliittisia vankeja

 @ISIDEWITH linkitetty…17tuntia17H

Myanmar Junta Releases Nearly 4,900 Prisoners in Surprise New Year Amnesty

Myanmar vapauttaa lähes 4 900 vankia, mukaan lukien vähintään 22 poliittista vankia

 @ISIDEWITH lähetetty…17tuntia17H

Myanmar Junta Releases Nearly 4,900 Prisoners in Surprise New Year Amnesty

 @ISIDEWITH linkitetty…17tuntia17H

China and Cambodia Forge 'All-Weather' Partnership Amid Rising Global Tensions

1st LD: China, Cambodia agree to build all-weather community with shared future in new era

 @ISIDEWITH linkitetty…17tuntia17H

China and Cambodia Forge 'All-Weather' Partnership Amid Rising Global Tensions

Urgent: China, Cambodia agree to build all-weather community with shared future in new era

 @ISIDEWITH linkitetty…17tuntia17H

China and Cambodia Forge 'All-Weather' Partnership Amid Rising Global Tensions

China, Cambodia agree to build all-weather community with shared future in new era

 @ISIDEWITH lähetetty…17tuntia17H

China and Cambodia Forge 'All-Weather' Partnership Amid Rising Global Tensions

 @ISIDEWITH lähetetty…17tuntia17H

Trump pilkkaa Bidenia, väittää Carterin 'kuolleen onnellisena' tietäen, ettei ollut huonoin presidentti.

 @ISIDEWITH lähetetty…18 tuntia18H

US Threatens to Abandon Ukraine-Russia Peace Talks Within Days Amid Stalled Progress